Link building in real life – A practical guide to dominating the SERPS
By Jaamit Durrani
He started by saying link building can be daunting. Link building is something huge and unmanageable. So the key is to break it down so that you can manage it. Plan link building by breaking it down on a monthly basis.
Don’t think about how you are going to achieve the links. Don’t go too far, you need to project plan link building process.
“slowly slowly catch monkey” – it doesn’t happen over night.
Quality vs Quantity
Which one shall I choose? This is actually a silly question to ask because both of these techniques work equally. What most people need to do is stop focusing on the homepage. You need to link build on deeper pages and not just the homepage.
Anchor text is your friend – Anchor text is still very powerful. But will Nichola Stott agree to this? In my understanding, I believe she said (along the lines) to link the brand names to improve the ranking at BrightonSEO.
When people say you need to create content, you will get links. This is slightly misleading because there is a lot to look at when link building. You still need a network to get the word out, like Lisa Myers mentioned on her presentation earlier.
Its time to burn our hats
The whole black hat and white hat created a “no fly zone” and makes people scared of testing.
Sites looked at:
Wall Glamour
“Wall stickers” is one of the key phrases for wall glamour which gets 165,000 search per month. Recently the ranking has dropped from number 1 to number 5. After looking at the back link analysis you can figure out why ranking dropped and also why you competitors are out ranking you.
Looked at the top two rankings who over took wall stickers.
Tools used to check the back link analysis:
- Link diagnosis
- Open site explorer
- Majestic SEO;
So what have the other two competitors done?
Competitor 1
Flooded with PHP fusion themes with footer links with exact anchor text.
Competitor 2
Dofollow blog comment spamming with exact anchor text.
So after finding this what do you do?
Do you report it to Google or do you do the same thing?
Yes you can report to Google but what will you get in return and it definitely won’t improve your ranking.
Jaamit’s recommends organising a plan of attack with various different link building techniques and also reporting them to Google.
How can I take back the number one spot?
Low level anchor text deep links at scale
- Article marketing sucks!!
There are other tools which will help you publish article automatically.
Anchor texts in copy links from well trafficked, high PR blogs
Guest blogging
This is great for rankings. Google loves these links. All you have to do is write a piece of quality content for a blog owner and ask them for a link coming back to your site. Like a guest post.
Tool/s:
- My blog guest
- Using Google queries
- Solo SEO
- Ontolo
Why does Google love this?
Google will look at the readers on the site and the links coming to that blog the quality basically.
Get links from trusted .ac.uk domains
One of the most powerful links you can ever get is through .ac.uk websites.
Below is an example for WallGlamour:
- Research and make a list of all the Art & Design schools & college in the UK
- Get on the phone and propose a joint “designer of the month” competition, the winner creates a WallGlamour sticker which is part of their portfolio
- Link(s) included as part of the collaboration,
The “Rub their faces in it” manoeuvre (1):
- Go one better than “sponsored” nasty PHP themes – team up with WP and other theme developers and give them your wall stick designers to convert into “website wall glamour” – get links from theme footer and developers sites.
- Take it one step further why not build a hub of link authority on your domain.
- Use Dofollow comments (tool – fast blog finder) – finds you on topic threads, identifies whether they are no follow or do follow.
Bonus: recover and claim onsite link juice
301 redirect a relevant site.
Try @yoast’s “redirect with notification” method – passes link juice and notifies users – YoastRedirect
Zath – technology and games blog.
How do you commence with your audience, this is the key to the link building for Zath.
Here are few ideas:
- The Zath Tech/Games Blogger Awards
- Invite guest bloggers to contribute to Zath
Notes:
- Create individual landing pages for your products so you can commence link building to that page.
- Don’t be scared of link building

Hi Saurav, thanks for the mention, but you’ve misunderstood the point I was making. My presentation asked if, as search professionals, are we over-engineering the link graph in the persuit of keyword-rich anchor text, in favour of brand term anchor text? In the joint study with Influence finder we found that there was a surprising low instance of keyword as anchor, for the top 10 ranked businesses for the term “outdoor clothing”. In fact at least one had zero links on the anchor “outdoor clothing”.
In the study, I deliberately made no conclusion, but since you’ve misquoted me, I’ll chuck my towel in the ring. ;-)Yes keyword rich anchor text matters and helps, but keyword rich anchors are naturally few and far between. How often have you blogged about a tool, or service and dropped an anchor you imagine to be exactly the phrase the business you’re referencing desires? KW-rich anchors are just one of many ways for a search engine to determine contextual relevance of page to term. Dependent on page, site and sector if the ratio of KW to “other” anchors is unnatural then you’re flirting with a penalty.
My biggest tip for linkbuilders – does it look like it belongs there? If not, then you probably wasted your time.
To be honest, I thought you had done some link building and then did research on the outdoor clothing sector, may be I did misunderstand, as you did not reach a conclusion and it was only for one term.
I see. The lack of conclusion was due to the fact this was a case study, therefore not an experiment/test against an hypothesis.
Here’s the original study for some additional context.
http://searchenginewatch.com/3641002
Hope that adds an interesting perspective.