Pre pubescent Facebook use: Zuckerberg says YES, Parents say NO.
My six year old brother asked my mother a couple of weeks ago whether he was allowed to open his own Facebook account using our home computer. My mum’s response was an immediate, stern “No”, in light of his young age.
Yesterday however, she informed me that my sibling had ignored her reply, opening his own account regardless.
Even though he did spell his name wrong during sign up, missing the “H” key twice (“Marsell Mattews”) I was amazed that he had the computer skills to complete such a task! But technical capabilities aside, many parents would still argue that six is far too early an age for children to begin social networking – even if they are just using the platform to play games, as my brother claims is true in his case. Comments on the matter gathered from parents working in the Fresh Egg office included:
- “I think the 13 age limit is sensible as I firmly believe children need to understand that just because it’s on the internet they can’t just do what they want. I have seen massive instances of bullying, shocking interaction between youngsters on Facebook who are obviously not 13 and wide spread abuse of the site.”
- “Kids shouldn’t be allowed on Facebook, they should be playing with dolls or something instead! Let children have their childhood!”
- “Facebook is a breeding ground for several threats including cyber bullying, grooming and intense social pressure. It is irrational to expose our children to these dangers.”
- “My daughter is 11 and constantly leaning on me to let her join Facebook – but I won’t let her yet. She hates me for that but I think you need a level of maturity and trust to use it wisely.”
- “Kids are not active enough as it is! TV and games consoles already encourage inactivity (and therefore; obesity). They really don’t need Facebook added to the mix too.”
These comments (which strongly indicate that Facebook is far from being considered a safe haven for young children) do not sit comfortably with CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg’s recent contention that Facebook should be accessible by those under the age of thirteen. As an advocate for educational reform, Zuckerberg declared this view earlier in the week at the NewSchools education summit in California.
“Education is clearly the biggest thing that will drive how the economy improves over the long term [...] In the future, software and technology will enable people to learn a lot from their fellow students.”
He then gave the example that Facebook could fuel study with the suggestion that students could see their peers learning online and this would in turn encourage users to do the same.
How this would work exactly is currently unclear (…you mean these kids won’t just waste time feeding chickens on Farmville and/or hijacking each other statuses?) but Zuckerberg is eager to challenge the current restrictions put in place by the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which states that any website collecting data on their users – like Facebook – must not be accessed by those under the magic age of 13.
“If [the restrictions] are lifted then we’d start to learn what works. We’d take a lot of precautions to make sure that [younger kids] are safe.”
I would say this is quite an ironic statement considering that fact that the privacy of adult Facebook users is somewhat questionable and so it seems ridiculous to also promise this in respect to (potential) younger users!
We are living in an increasingly digital world. Whilst it is certain that technology will become gradually more central to educational endeavours in the future and that it is no doubt important for children to gain vital IT skills at an early age, it is my opinion that Facebook – or any social network -should not attempt to be at the forefront of this evolution.
As adults, we know all too well the amount of time that can be wasted prying into the lives of other people on Facebook, the majority of which we would not consider to be of any importance away from the networking platform. Should children be encouraged to indulge in such procrastination? No. Educational suggestions will not detract young users from the typical uses of the site.
It is also all too easy to begin seeing ourselves in the third person when using Facebook heavily, gaining a manufactured sense of self in the form of a profile page and carefully angled, flattering photographs. Several authors and psychologists have explored how this can fuel depression in users. Misery is rife in the lives of teenagers already (or so they would have you believe) and so subjecting them to this at an even earlier age won’t win you any parent points!
Children should be out playing and making friends in the real world…not online.


Im a childrens nanny ..to be honest the kids i look after have it …they are 12 and 11 respectively ..when im nt with them i keep in touch with them by using facebook ..we have fun on there share photos but their mother and i keep a close eye on whats going on ..i keep my page clean because of them .. Socailly its great for them they are not sittin on their facebook until all hours they lead active lives plenty of after school clubs and to be honest its the one time the kids get to relax !!so im in agreement with it ..
There is a good book (Brain Rules for Baby) on the subject that talks about how children are now using mobile phones and site such as Facebook so early they don’t develop communication skills correctly. If you hit the Googles with Brain Rules for Baby podcast, should be their in the topish area.
Facebook IMO needs to be 13+ or 18+ COPPA button or no it’s just harmful for young children to be spending time on the web let allow on a platform such as FB. Get them out in the fresh air interacting with each other or they will end up emotionally undeveloped.
Absolutely right. The kids will probably end up with Facebook accounts sooner or later, as most of us do, so Zuckerberg will still hit his targets ;)
Meanwhile, the social implications and long-term cultural effects of Facebook etc still aren’t known for ‘sensible’ grown ups – let’s leave children out of the experiment for as long a spossible.
I think because of the advanced computer skills of young children there are two ways it could go. Either enforce stricter signing up processes or embrace it, and have advanced security settings so it is essentially a ‘children only’ Facebook, either way, Facebook has a lot to think about!
I think if the parents are finding that they’re spending a lot of time not doing anything constructive on Facebook, then it’s a dead cert they’re not going to convinced their kids are going to do any better.
But, as the Fast Food mantra goes, if you get ‘em young, you have a customer (and all associated marketing profile data) for life.
My 13 year old cousin is the first to fall for ridiculous replicating Facebook spam (“Click here to see Osama Bin Laden’s corpse!”). The thought of a child being set loose on the damned thing is dreadful.
Even aside from the ‘child predator with a hotline to your home’ angle, this bothers me because it emphasises all the things that are completely rubbish about pre-teen life (peer pressure, conformity, bullying and all that stuff), and gives it all a level of longevity that you simply never used to have.
Or perhaps I just hate kids and wish they weren’t trying to get me to look at Osama Bin Laden’s cadaver.
Regardless of what we tell our kids, they can still make their own judgments. What’s the point limiting FB access whilst at the same time parents spends hours and hours on the social network, catching up with friends, flirting or even growing veggies and feeding animals?
Could FB addicted parents motivate their kinds to go out and play? Kids and parents should walk hand in hand, don’t you think?
The earlier a child can start using social networking sites, the more rigorously a parent can control and guide how the sites are being used with total access with passwords for parents etc to monitor use.
The issues with bullying etc crop up even on sites such as Moshi Monsters which is primitive social networking for pre-teens.